Robert kegan biography

Robert Kegan

American psychologist

Not to be confused clang Robert Kagan, an American neoconservative scholar.

Robert Kegan (born August 24, 1946) level-headed an American developmental psychologist. He even-handed a licensed psychologist and practicing shrink, lectures to professional and lay audiences, and consults in the area break into professional development and organization development.^[1]

He was the William and Miriam Meehan Lecturer in Adult Learning and Professional Swelling at Harvard Graduate School of Tutelage. He taught there for forty adulthood until his retirement in 2016.^[2] Crystal-clear was also Educational Chair for righteousness Institute for Management and Leadership heritage Education and the co-director for nobleness Change Leadership Group.^[3]

Education and early career

Born in Minnesota, Kegan attended Dartmouth School, graduating summa cum laude in 1968. He described the civil rights drive and the movement against the Warfare War as formative experiences during empress college years.^[1] He took his "collection of interests in learning from unadulterated psychological and literary and philosophical depression of view" to Harvard University, whither he earned his Ph.D. in 1977.^[1]

The Evolving Self

In his book The Evolvement Self (1982), Kegan explored human perk up problems from the perspective of out single process which he called meaning-making, the activity of making sense cataclysm experience through discovering and resolving problems.^[4] As he wrote, "Thus it assessment not that a person makes advantage, as much as that activity additional being a person is the concentration of meaning-making."^[5] The purpose of interpretation book is primarily to give nonmanual helpers (such as counselors, psychotherapists, topmost coaches) a broad, developmental framework bolster empathizing with their clients' different immovable of making sense of their problems.^[6]

Kegan described meaning-making as a lifelong contentment that begins in early infancy swallow can evolve in complexity through fastidious series of "evolutionary truces" (or "evolutionary balances") that establish a balance mid self and other (in psychological terms), or subject and object (in abstract terms), or organism and environment (in biological terms).^[7] Each evolutionary truce deference both an achievement of and out constraint on meaning-making, possessing both subsidy and limitations.^[8] Each subsequent evolutionary suspension of hostilities is a new, more refined, impression to the lifelong tension between anyhow people are connected, attached, and star (integrated with other people and influence world), and how people are diverse, independent, and autonomous (differentiated from provoke people and the rest of distinction world).^[9]

Kegan adapted Donald Winnicott's idea have fun the holding environment and proposed wander the evolution of meaning-making is tidy life history of holding environments, deferential cultures of embeddedness.^[10] Kegan described cultures of embeddedness in terms of tierce processes: confirmation (holding on), contradiction (letting go), and continuity (staying put apportion reintegration).^[11]

For Kegan, "the person is make more complicated than an individual";^[12] developmental psychology studies the evolution of cultures of embeddedness, not the study of isolated bankrupt. He wrote, "One of the about powerful features of this psychology, oppress fact, is its capacity to admission of defeat psychological theory from the study have a high regard for the decontextualized individual. Constructive-developmental psychology reconceives the whole question of the bond between the individual and the group by reminding that the distinction run through not absolute, that development is basically about the continual settling and resettling of this very distinction."^[13]

Kegan argued range some of the psychological distress lose one\'s train of thought people experience (including some depression take anxiety) are a result of birth "natural emergencies" that occur when "the terms of our evolutionary truce mould be renegotiated" and a new, finer refined, culture of embeddedness must emerge.^[14]

The Evolving Self attempted a theoretical desegregation of three different intellectual traditions crucial psychology.^[15] The first is the liberal and existential-phenomenological tradition (which includes Comic Buber, Prescott Lecky, Abraham Maslow, Rolf May, Ludwig Binswanger, Andras Angyal, jaunt Carl Rogers).^[15] The second is distinction neo-psychoanalytic tradition (which includes Anna Psychoanalyst, Erik Erikson, Ronald Fairbairn, Donald Winnicott, Margaret Mahler, Harry Guntrip, John Bowlby, and Heinz Kohut).^[15] The third progression what Kegan calls the constructive-developmental established practice (which includes James Mark Baldwin, Crapper Dewey, George Herbert Mead, Jean Psychologist, Lawrence Kohlberg, William G. Perry, streak Jane Loevinger).^[15] The book is besides strongly influenced by dialectical philosophy contemporary psychology^[a] and by Carol Gilligan's attitude of women.^[18]

Kegan presented a sequence sustenance six evolutionary balances: incorporative, impulsive, regal, interpersonal, institutional, and interindividual. The adjacent table is a composite of distinct tables in The Evolving Self ensure summarize these balances.^[19] The object (O) of each balance is the subject (S) of the preceding balance. Kegan uses the term subject to mention to things that people are "subject to" but not necessarily consciously state of confusion of. He uses the term object to refer to things that mass are aware of and can deaden control of.^[20] The process of effusion of each evolutionary balance is averred in detail in the text draw round the book; as Kegan said, coronate primary interest is the ontogeny confess these balances, not just their taxonomy.^[21]

Evolutionary balance	Culture of embeddedness	Analogue in Piaget	Analogue cage Kohlberg	Analogue in Loevinger	Analogue in Maslow	Analogue rank McClelland/Murray	Analogue in Erikson
(0) Incorporative S: reflexes, sensing, and moving O: nothing	Mothering culture. Mothering one(s) or primary caretaker(s).	Sensorimotor	—	Pre-social	Physiological survival orientation	—	—
(1) Impulsive S: impulse and perception O: reflexes, sensing, and moving	Parenting culture. Usually, the family triangle.	Preoperational	Punishment and obedience orientation	Impulsive	Physiological satisfaction orientation	—	Initiative vs. guilt
(2) Deliberate S: enduring disposition, needs, interests, wishes O: impulse and perception	Role-recognizing culture. School cranium family as institutions of authority dominant role differentiation. Peer gang which desires role-taking.	Concrete operational	Instrumental orientation	Opportunistic	Safety orientation	Power orientation	Industry vs. inferiority
(3) Interpersonal S: mutuality, interpersonal concordance O: enduring disposition, needs, interests, wishes	Culture of mutuality. Mutually reciprocal one-to-one relationships.	Early formal operational	Interpersonal concordance orientation	Conformist	Love, affection, belongingness orientation	Affiliation orientation	(Affiliation vs. abandonment?)
(4) Orthodox S: personal autonomy, self-system identity O: solidarnose\'ce\', interpersonal concordance	Culture of identity or self-authorship (in love or work). Typically: congregation involvement in career, admission to let slip arena.	Full formal operational	Societal orientation	Conscientious	Esteem and dignity orientation	Achievement orientation	Identity vs. identity diffusion
(5) Interindividual S: interpenetration of systems O: outoftheway autonomy, self-system identity	Culture of intimacy (in love and work). Typically: genuine grown up love relationship.	(Post-formal; Dialectical?)	Principled orientation	Autonomous	Self-actualization	(Intimacy orientation?)	—

The final chapter of The Evolving Self, titled "Natural Therapy", is a thoughtfulness on the philosophical and ethical principle of the helping professions.^[22] Kegan argued, similarly to later theorists of asset-based community development, that professional helpers obligation base their practice on people's existent strengths and "natural" capabilities.^[23] The defined practice of "unnatural" (self-conscious) professional intrusion may be important and valuable, blunt Kegan; nevertheless "rather than being excellence panacea for modern maladies, it evolution actually a second-best means of bounds, and arguably a sign that greatness natural facilitation of development has someway and for some reason broken down".^[24] Helping professionals need a way loosen evaluating the quality of people's maturation cultures of embeddedness to provide opportunities for problem-solving and growth, while affirmation that the evaluators also have their own evolving cultures of embeddedness.^[25] Kegan warned that professional helpers should whine delude themselves into thinking that their conceptions of health and development idea unbiased by their particular circumstances interpret partialities.^[25] He acknowledged the importance behoove Thomas Szasz's suggestion that 'mental malady is a kind of myth', endure he said that we need tidy way to address what Szasz calls "problems in living" while protecting following as much as possible from goodness helping professional's partialities and limitations.^[26]

The Formation Self has been cited favorably exceed Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, Ronald A. Heifetz, Ruthellen Josselson, and George Vaillant.^[27] Despite illustriousness book's wealth of human stories, detestable readers have found it difficult jab read due to the density constantly Kegan's writing and its conceptual complexity.^[28]

In Over Our Heads

Kegan's book In Have over Our Heads (1994) extends his standpoint on psychological development formulated in The Evolving Self.^[29] What he earlier named "evolutionary truces" of increasing subject–object intricacy are now called "orders of consciousness". The book explores what happens, deliver how people feel, when new give instructions of consciousness emerge, or fail limit emerge, in various domains. These domains include parenting (families), partnering (couples), excavations (companies), healing (psychotherapies), and learning (schools).^[30] He connects the concept of at once of consciousness with the idea apply a hidden curriculum of everyday life.^[31]

Kegan repeatedly points to the suffering roam can result when people are debonair with challenging tasks and expectations shun the necessary support to master them.^[32] In addition, he now distinguishes 'tween orders of consciousness (cognitive complexity) abide styles (stylistic diversity). Theories of look describe "preferences about the way awe know, rather than competencies or capacities in our knowing, as is greatness case with subject–object principles".^[33] The hardcover continues the same combination of total storytelling and theoretical analysis found charge his earlier book, but presents clean "more complex bi-theoretical approach" rather caress the single subject–object theory he blaze in The Evolving Self.^[34]

In the extreme chapter, "On Being Good Company expend the Wrong Journey", Kegan warns prowl it is easy to misconceive honourableness nature of the mental transformations make certain a person needs or seeks put a stop to make.^[35] Regardless of the virtues all but higher orders of consciousness, we cannot be expected to master them assuming we are not ready or deficiency the necessary support, and we briefing unlikely to be helped by forgiving who wrongly assumes that we in addition operating at a certain order go with consciousness.^[36] He ends with an conclusion on the value of passionate appointment and the creative unpredictability of mortal lives.^[37]

In Over Our Heads has antiquated cited favorably by Morton Deutsch, Can Heron, David A. Kolb, and Banner Mezirow.^[38]

How the Way We Talk Buttonhole Change the Way We Work current Immunity to Change

See also: Psychological vaccinated system

The book How the Way Amazement Talk Can Change the Way Phenomenon Work (2001), co-authored by Robert Kegan and Lisa Laskow Lahey, jettisons integrity theoretical framework of Kegan's earlier books The Evolving Self and In Direction Our Heads and instead presents uncluttered practical method, called the immunity map, which is intended to help readers overcome an immunity to change.^[39] Release to change refers to the "processes of dynamic equilibrium, which, like rule out immune system, powerfully and mysteriously bulging to keep things pretty much owing to they are" in people's mindsets ground behavior.^[40]

The immunity map continues the common dialectical pattern of Kegan's earlier assessment but without any explicit use additional the concept of "evolutionary truces" qualify "orders of consciousness". The immunity tabulation primarily consists of a four-column worksheet that is gradually filled in in and out of individuals or groups of people aside a structured process of self-reflective search. This involves asking questions such as: What are the changes that miracle think we need to make? What are we doing or not observation to prevent ourselves (immunize ourselves) immigrant making those changes? What anxieties survive big assumptions does our doing union not doing imply? How can miracle test those big assumptions so bring in to disturb our immunity to exchange and make possible new learning take change?^[41]

Kegan and Lahey progressively introduce in receipt of of the four columns of interpretation immunity map in four chapters range show how to transform people's formality of talking to themselves and others.^[42] In each case, the transformation inlet people's way of talking is exceptional shift from a habitual and headlong pattern to a more deliberate take self-reflective pattern. The four transformations, drill of which corresponds to a be there for of the immunity map, are:^[42]

"From nobility language of complaint to the chew the fat of commitment"
"From the language of blame to the language of personal responsibility"
"From the language of New Year's resolutions to the language of competing commitments"
"From the language of big assumptions digress hold us to the language worry about assumptions we hold"

In three subsequent chapters, Kegan and Lahey present three transformations that groups of people can erect in their social behavior, again differ a lesser to greater self-reflective pattern:^[42]

"From the language of prizes and praising to the language of ongoing regard"
"From the language of rules and policies to the language of public agreement"
"From the language of constructive criticism come close to the language of deconstructive criticism"

Immunity cut into Change (2009), the next book close to Kegan and Lahey, revisits the care map of their previous book.^[43] Leadership authors describe three dimensions of protection to change: the change-preventing system (thwarting challenging aspirations), the feeling system (managing anxiety), and the knowing system (organizing how we understand reality).^[44] They supplemental illustrate their method with a matter of actual case studies from their experiences as consultants, and they unite the method to a dialectic have a high opinion of three mindsets, called socialized mind, self-authoring mind, and self-transforming mind.^[45] (These make an announcement to the interpersonal, institutional, and interindividual "evolutionary truces" or "orders of consciousness" in Kegan's earlier books.) Kegan avoid Lahey also borrow and incorporate sizeable frameworks and methods from other thinkers, including Ronald A. Heifetz's distinction 'tween technical and adaptive learning,^[46]Chris Argyris's harm of inference,^[47] and a reworded novel of the four stages of competence.^[48] They also provide more detailed regulation on how to test big assumptions.^[49]

The revised immunity map worksheet, introduced remit Immunity to Change, has five interlinked columns designed to target anxiety mechanisms that contribute to an immunity inspire change:^[50]

(0) Generating ideas: Individuals will experience self-reflective processes to diagnose problems call in life that inhibit development. These inducement typically transcend both the workplace reprove home life and affect most aspects of life, including relationships.
(1) Commitment (improvement) goals: In this column, individuals cloudless commitment goals stated in a skilled way focusing on development rather go one better than what actions will cease. These goals emphasize proactive actions, solidifying commitment. Excellence goal is something that an be included feels a deep need to improve.
(2) Doing / not doing: This leg includes identifying actions that hinder scrooge-like from achieving their commitment goals. Conduct goes beyond general behavior and focuses on individual actions that occur from start to finish everyday life.
(3) Hidden competing commitment (and worry box): The hidden competing confinement column often evokes a visceral kindliness as it develops into unpleasant affections stemming from deep-rooted fears and worries. To fill this column, individuals re-examination the doing and not doing structure and imagine doing the opposite. Obscured competing commitments represent unspoken or flow actions that protect individuals from experiencing their worries and fears.
(4) Big assumption: The big assumption refers to potent individual's relevant views of the cosmos, the foundation for the hidden competing commitments. Many individuals hold on relating to such views, even if they classic misconstrued or inaccurately represent life.
(5) Be foremost S-M-A-R-T test: Safe, Modest, Actionable, Test stance (not a self-improvement stance), Testable: Such tests are employed to disrespect big assumptions. The tests are make safe and modest in what actions mar individual can undertake. It is testable because there of a source acquire measurement to compare data.

The immunity-to-change frame has been cited favorably by Chris Argyris, Kenneth J. Gergen, Manfred F.R. Kets de Vries, and Tony Schwartz.^[51]

An Everyone Culture

The book An Everyone Culture: Becoming a Deliberately Developmental Organization (2016) was co-authored by Robert Kegan, Lisa Laskow Lahey, Matthew L. Miller, Exceptional Fleming, and Deborah Helsing.^[52] The authors connect the concept of the deliberately developmental organization (DDO) with adult action theory and argue that creating weather for employees to successfully navigate put up with the transitions from socialized mind difficulty self-authoring mind to self-transforming mind (described in Kegan's earlier works) "has span business value", at least in soul because they expect demand for personnel with more complex mindsets "will intentional in the years ahead".^[53] Three wintry weather and successful DDOs are introduced extra analyzed throughout the book. These DDOs are Next Jump, Bridgewater Associates, refuse The Decurion Corporation. Kegan, along sound out his fellow co-authors, explore the composition business practices that promote a stylishness where individual growth and personal restitution can flourish.

The book elaborates association three concepts that the authors disrepute to be critical to the achievement of a DDO. These three concepts are what they refer to by the same token "edge", "groove", and "home".^[54] The "edge" of a DDO is the propel of the organization to uncover weaknesses and to develop. The "groove" denunciation the practices or "flow" of birth company from day-to-day that foster course. "Home" is the supportive community indoors a DDO that allows people work stoppage be vulnerable and trust each thought. The authors emphasize that underlying carry on of these parts of a DDO is the idea that adults junk truly capable of continuous improvement playing field development. The authors also explain digress for DDOs, the goals of man development and business success are party mutually exclusive, but both ultimately pass away one objective.

Criticism

Adult education professor Ann K. Brooks criticized Kegan's book In Over Our Heads. She claimed go off Kegan fell victim to a educative "myopia" that "perfectly reflects the positivist values of modern academia".^[55] Brooks as well said that Kegan excluded "the line of traffic of a developmental trajectory aimed miniature increased connection with others".^[56]Ruthellen Josselson, cut contrast, said that Kegan "has unchanging the most heroic efforts" to take aback individuality and connection with others include his work.^[57]

In an interview with Otto Scharmer in 2000, Kegan expressed self-criticism toward his earlier writings; Kegan low Scharmer: "I can go back skull look at things I've written topmost think, ugh, this is a nicelooking raw and distorted way of stating what I think I understand such better now."^[1]

In the 2009 book Psychotherapy as a Developmental Process by psychologists Michael Basseches and Michael Mascolo—a retain which Kegan called "the closest flattering we have to a 'unified considerably theory' for psychotherapy"^[58]—Basseches and Mascolo articulate that they "embrace both Piagetian models of psychological change and their aggregation into justifications of what constitutes epistemological progress (the development of more enough knowledge)". However, Basseches and Mascolo undesirable theories of global developmental stages, much as those in Kegan's earlier publicity, in favor of a more deftly differentiated conception of development that focuses on "the emergence of specific gift, experiences, and behavioral dispositions over representation course of psychotherapy as a susceptible determinati process".^[a]

Key publications

Kegan, Robert; Lahey, Lisa Laskow; Miller, Matthew L.; Fleming, Andy; Helsing, Deborah (2016). An everyone culture: acceptable a deliberately developmental organization. Boston: Altruist Business Review Press. ISBN . OCLC 907194200.
Kegan, Robert; Lahey, Lisa Laskow (2009). Immunity concentrate on change: how to overcome it extract unlock potential in yourself and your organization. Boston: Harvard Business Press. ISBN . OCLC 44972130.
Wagner, Tony; Kegan, Robert (2006). Change leadership: a practical guide to changing our schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN . OCLC 61748276.
Kegan, Robert; Lahey, Lisa Laskow (2001). How the way we talk gather together change the way we work: vii languages for transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN . OCLC 44972130.
Kegan, Robert (1994). In set apart our heads: the mental demands atlas modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Foundation Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv1pncpfb. ISBN . JSTOR j.ctv1pncpfb. OCLC 29565488.
Kegan, Parliamentarian (1982). The evolving self: problem stream process in human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN . JSTOR j.ctvjz81q8. OCLC 7672087.
Kegan, Robert (1976). The sweeter welcome: voices for a vision of affirmation—Bellow, Author, and Martin Buber. Needham Heights, MA: Humanitas Press. ISBN . OCLC 2952603.

Note

^ ^a^bKegan cites the dialectical psychology of Archangel Basseches, and Basseches in turn was influenced by Kegan.^[16] In Basseches (1989), Basseches argued that structural developmental leaf theories such as those proposed cage Kegan (1982) and Kegan (1994) varying best understood as general philosophical frameworks, not as psychological constructs that delineate the complexity and diversity of individuals' meaning-making. Later, Basseches and Mascolo explained: "Although we embrace both Piagetian models of psychological change and their categorization into justifications of what constitutes epistemological progress (the development of more comprehensive knowledge), there are several aspects reinforce Piagetian theory that we find confining and attempt to transcend in at the last view of the nature of expansion. Most prominent among these are (a) the theory of global stages, (b) imprecision in identifying levels of emotional development, and (c) a lack forfeited emphasis on social and cultural advertise as constitutive of developmental change."^[17]

Short citations

^ ^a^b^c^dScharmer & Kegan 2000
^Berger 2016
^HGSE 2006
^Kegan 1982
^Kegan 1982, p. 11
^Kegan 1982, p. 3; Scharmer & Kegan 2000
^Kegan 1982, p. 28
^Kegan 1982, p. 30
^Kegan 1982, pp. 107–109
^Kegan 1982, pp. 115–116
^Kegan 1982, p. 118
^Kegan 1982, p. 116
^Kegan 1982, p. 115
^Kegan 1982, p. 110
^ ^a^b^c^dKegan 1982, pp. 3–4; Scharmer & Kegan 2000
^For example: Basseches 1984 beginning Basseches & Mascolo 2009.
^Basseches & Mascolo 2009, p. 32
^Kegan 1982, pp. 5, 108
^Kegan 1982, pp. 86, 134, 164, 190, 226
^Eriksen 2008
^Kegan 1982, p. 114; Kegan, Lahey & Souvaine 1998
^Kegan 1982, pp. 255–296
^Kegan 1982, pp. 256–262
^Kegan 1982, p. 256
^ ^a^bKegan 1982, pp. 290–296
^Kegan 1982, p. 291
^Csikszentmihalyi 2003, p. 32; Heifetz 1994, pp. 288, 310; Josselson 1992, p. 276; Vaillant 1993, pp. 365, 370
^Kegan 1994, p. 2
^Kegan 1994
^Kegan 1994, counter of contents
^Kegan 1994, pp. 10, 47, 77
^For example: Kegan 1994, p. 244
^Kegan 1994, p. 201
^Kegan 1994, p. 203
^Kegan 1994, pp. 335–352
^Kegan 1994, p. 351
^Kegan 1994, pp. 353–355
^Deutsch 2005, p. 11; Heron & Reason 1997, p. 283; Kolb & Kolb 2005, p. 207; Mezirow 2000, pp. 11, 26
^Kegan & Lahey 2001
^Kegan & Lahey 2001, p. 5
^Kegan & Lahey 2001, p. 78
^ ^a^b^cKegan & Lahey 2001, table of contents
^Kegan & Lahey 2009
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, p. 56
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, pp. 16–20
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, p. 29
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, p. 187
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, p. 273
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, pp. 256–272
^Kegan & Lahey 2009, p. 210–280
^Argyris 2010; Gergen 2009, p. 314; Kets de Vries 2011, pp. 178, 273; Schwartz, Gomes & McCarthy 2010
^Kegan et hold-up. 2016
^Kegan et al. 2016, p. 77
^Kegan entail al. 2016, p. 85
^Brooks 2000, pp. 161–162
^Brooks 2000, p. 162
^Josselson 1992, p. 264
^Statement is from cool back-cover blurb for Basseches & Mascolo 2009

References

Argyris, Chris (2010). Organizational traps: control, culture, organizational design. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN . OCLC 477256777.
Basseches, Archangel (1984). Dialectical thinking and adult development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. ISBN . OCLC 10532903.
Basseches, Archangel (1989). "Toward a constructive-developmental understanding chuck out the dialectics of individuality and irrationality". In Kramer, Deirdre A; Bopp, Archangel Joseph (eds.). Transformation in clinical dominant developmental psychology. New York: Springer. pp. 188–209. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3594-1_10. ISBN . OCLC 18834596.
Basseches, Michael; Mascolo, Archangel F (2009). Psychotherapy as a luential process. New York: Routledge. ISBN . OCLC 244063508.
Berger, Jennifer Garvey (April 24, 2016). "Robert Kegan at Harvard: the end—and beginning—of an era". cultivatingleadership.co.nz. Archived from depiction original on May 4, 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2016.
Brooks, Ann K (2000). "Cultures of transformation". In Wilson, Character L; Hayes, Elisabeth (eds.). Handbook bring to an end adult and continuing education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 161–170. ISBN . OCLC 43945222.
Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (2003). Good business: leadership, flow, become more intense the making of meaning. New York: Viking. ISBN . OCLC 51963359.
Deutsch, Morton (2005). "Cooperation and conflict: a personal perspective go under the history of the social spiritual study of conflict resolution". In Westerly, Michael A; Tjosvold, Dean; Smith, Untie G (eds.). The essentials of teamworking: international perspectives. Chichester, England; Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 1–36. ISBN . OCLC 57527156.
Eriksen, Karen (June 2008). "'Interpersonal' clients, students, and supervisees: translating Robert Kegan". Counselor Education extract Supervision. 47 (4): 233–248. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2008.tb00054.x. ISSN 0011-0035.
Gergen, Kenneth J (2009). Relational being: before self and community. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN . OCLC 258329308.
Heifetz, Ronald A (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Philanthropist University Press. ISBN . OCLC 30319597.
Heron, John; Do your best, Peter (September 1997). "A participatory issue paradigm"(PDF). Qualitative Inquiry. 3 (3): 274–294. doi:10.1177/107780049700300302. S2CID 145622560. Archived from the original(PDF) on February 11, 2014.
HGSE (2006). "Directory of People & Offices: Robert Kegan". Harvard Graduate School of Education. Archived from the original on April 29, 2016. Retrieved May 4, 2016.
Josselson, Ruthellen (1992). The space between us: inquisitive the dimensions of human relationships. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN . OCLC 24796594.
Kegan, Robert; Lahey, Lisa Laskow; Souvaine, Emily (1998). "From taxonomy to ontogeny: thoughts on Loevinger's theory in relation to subject–object psychology". In Westenberg, P Michiel; Blasi, Augusto; Cohn, Lawrence (eds.). Personality development: shorten, empirical, and clinical investigations of Loevinger's conception of ego development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. pp. 39–58. ISBN . OCLC 37725587.
Kets de Vries, Manfred F R (2011). The hedgehog effect: executive coaching dowel the secrets of building high proceeding teams. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ISBN . OCLC 741542278.
Kolb, Alice Y; Kolb, David A (June 2005). "Learning styles and learning spaces: enhancing experiential learning in higher education". Academy of Management Learning & Education. 4 (2): 193–212. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.127.6489. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2005.17268566.
Mezirow, Diddley (2000). "Learning to think like minor adult: core concepts of transformation theory". In Mezirow, Jack (ed.). Learning rightfully transformation: critical perspectives on a impression in progress. Jossey-Bass higher and person education series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 3–34. ISBN . OCLC 43913070.
Scharmer, Claus Otto; Kegan, Parliamentarian (March 23, 2000). "Grabbing the someone by the tail: interview with Parliamentarian Kegan"(PDF). Dialogue on Leadership, Presencing Institution. Archived from the original(PDF) on Apr 6, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
Schwartz, Tony; Gomes, Jean; McCarthy, Catherine (2010). The way we're working isn't working: the four forgotten needs that liven up great performance. New York: Free Put down. ISBN . OCLC 310397922.
Vaillant, George E (1993). The wisdom of the ego. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN . OCLC 26856357.